Connect with us

Trending News

Chase Bank’s Customer’s Information Has Been Compromised in the Largest Cyber Breach Ever

Avatar

Published

on

The last thing most people expect to happen when they give their money and information to their banks is for someone to steal it. Unfortunately, there are currently two men being held captive in Israel and Moscow for doing doing some serious financial cyber attacking. The trio charged are Ziv Orenstein Gery from Israel and Joshua Samuel Aaron from Moscow. They will be charged for stealing over 100 million bank customer’s contact information. Last summer’s theft of data released sensitive information like email addresses, physical addresses, phone numbers and names of about 90 million Chase Bank customers. The men also got charged with twenty-three counts related to wiring fraud and securities. Four, in particular, was the conspiracy to commit security fraud, security fraud, conspiracy to commit PC hacking, PC hacking.

Preet Bharara, an attorney present at the news conference said that the ordeal was the biggest theft of customer information from a US bank. Loretta E. Lynch, the Attorney General stated that the suspects successfully committed one of the biggest theft related to financial data in the history of the US. Those that did this were getting away with and using other’s personal information by the thousands.

In the state of New York, there was a formal accusation left unsealed in Manhattan’s Federal Court stated discovering sensitive info on more bank customers also got stolen in cyber attacks that date all the way back to 2012 up until the summer of 2014. In those cases, the crime happened with several financial institutions and financial news publishers. The start of the hacking occurred early eight years ago, and one or more of the suspects responsible for the crime dabbled in various other criminal schemes. One of them included the function and development of at least twelve web based casinos that violated US laws and another concerned America’s securities market manipulation schemes.

The millions of dollars that these men stole were hidden in Swiss accounts and various banks that had no ties to their name. Attorney Bharara concluded that this type of hacking was a business model. Their motive was to either to glance unsuspectingly at executives email to thwart their rivals or to take the customer base of competing web-based casino companies.

Another indictment was made in the last week that had several charges against Anthony Murgio, who authorities believe was operating a Bitcoin exchange business without a license. There seems to be a connection with him and the Chase Bank hack. Authorities who investigated the case stated that the men made over 200 false identities thirty of which were created by false passports that were “missed” out by the US as well as about 18 other countries.

Another related indictment that was recently unsealed said that an unknown hacker and Shalon used web-based chats to talk about the plans they had. Attorney Horn mentioned the two men had some success when they cold-called investors and fabricated a conversation saying they wanted to sell their database to a different bank. Horn also mentioned that the private contact information belonging to over 12 million Scottrade and E-trade customers got compromised around the end of 2013.

Crimes that are related to these businesses are added to the New York indictment, but the businesses names are not mentioned. Shalon’s lawyer cannot be reached for questions at the moment, and Orenstein’s lawyer failed to respond. Bharara stated that the US law enforcement worked together like never before in the prosecution. Bharara said that that the hurtful reality is that there are various types of cyber crimes that often remain unsolved and the suspects get to walk away free. Most of the times when these type of events get investigated, the trail will grow cold, and that would be the end of the story. They are hoping and trusting that they can change such unfortunate events from happening and this case will be the start of it.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Here’s When You Can Expect Social Security Cuts

Avatar

Published

on

Here’s When You Can Expect Social Security Cuts

Social Security is a retirement cornerstone for tens of millions of Americans. According to the Centers for Budget and Policy Priorities, every year it keeps 15 million retirees out of poverty.

Unfortunately, the program is facing massive financial hurdles. It has been collecting a net cash surplus for the last 38 years. However, starting next year, it is projected to run a $21.1 billion net cash outflow.

The program entered the decade with a reserve of $2.9 trillion in assets. Although, many expect the net outflows to increase each year and chip away at the reserve by $1.1 trillion. This leaves the program with only $1.8 trillion in reserves by 2029.

The program isn’t facing bankruptcy or insolvency. Instead, it is more and more likely that retirees will soon face reductions in their benefits to keep the program afloat.

Two trusts actually make up Social Security. The first one is the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) trust. It provides payouts to retired workers and survivors of deceased workers. The other is the Disability Insurance (DI) trust. This one supplies payments to workers that are long-term disabled.

When reporting on the state of the program, the Social Security Board of Trustees generally lumps the two trusts together. However, each trust is independent and faces individual risks.

Of the two, the OASI is projected to be in financial distress the soonest. The latest Trustee report estimates that the OASI will deplete its asset reserves by 2034. Meanwhile, the DI trust could possibly depleat its reserves in 2065.

But because the OASI is much larger than the DI trust ($2.8 trillion of the combined $2.9 trillion in reserves), the combined trusts are projected to become insolvent in 2035.

So expect the first major cuts to come in 2035 in an effort to avoid insolvency. Those efforts will involve a potential bitter pill for retirees to swallow.

Unless Congress finds a way to raise additional revenue and/or reduce outlays, retired workers and survivors of deceased workers can expect a 24% reduction in monthly benefits starting in 2035. While that seems a long time from now, it’s only 15 years away and will be here sooner than you think.

In real numbers, a retiree who receives the average monthly Social Security benefit of $1,503 today would see their monthly benefit reduced to $1,142 per month, or $361 less to live on. A married couple receiving $2,531 in monthly benefits would see their check cut by $608 per month, down to $1,923.

While the monthly reduction stings, looking at it from a lifetime benefit approach magnifies the worries for retirees trying to live out their golden years. A hypothetical worker who retires this year and starts receiving benefits would typically expect to collect about $500,000 in Social Security benefits. A 25% reduction means they would see their benefits cut by $120,000, down to only $380,000 in retirement benefits.

A married couple would see their projected $1 million in benefits reduced by $240,000 down to $760,000. That’s not an easily-replaced amount of retirement income.

If there is a glimmer of hope, it’s that Congress can take action to avoid – or delay – the day of reckoning. Yes, they’ve known since 1985 that the program would one day run out of money. But if there is one thing that the government is good at, it’s waiting until the last minute to really dig in and find a solution.

Let’s hope they can set aside their differences and put America’s retirees first.

Up Next:

Continue Reading

Business

‘The Great Reset’ Will Push Socialist Agenda Across The Globe

Avatar

Published

on

‘The Great Reset’ Will Push Socialist Agenda Across The Globe

Quietly, while the coronavirus pandemic distracted the world, a group of liberal “key global governmental and business leaders” met in Switzerland and planned the next coup d’etat to take over the global economy. Many call it The Great Reset. It also means “dangerous times for those who support individual liberties and free markets.”

The World Economic Forum will hold a summit next year to further their initiative. According to them, “The Great Reset is a commitment to jointly and urgently build the foundations of our economic and social system for a more fair, sustainable and resilient future. It requires a new social contract centred on human dignity, social justice and where societal progress does not fall behind economic development.”

What it really is trying to accomplish is using the coronavirus pandemic as a cover. They’re aiming for a renewed push for socialism and climate change initiatives.

The Economy and the Pandemic

You have to ask yourself, how did capitalism or climate change create the COVID-19 pandemic? They obviously didn’t, but remember, never let a crisis go to waste.

Klaus Schwab, the founder and executive chairman of WEF, said “COVID-19 has shown us that our old systems are not fit for the 21st century,” and “we need a global reset… we must not miss this unique window of opportunity.”

António Guterres, the UN Secretary-General, also weighed in on the topic. He said, “We must build equal, inclusive, sustainable societies, that are more resilient in the face of pandemics and climate change.”

Kristalina Georgieva, the Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund, made it very clear that the expansion of social programs should serve as the goal of The Great Reset.

“If we were to concentrate in investing in people, in the social fabric of our societies, in access to opportunities and education for all, in expansion of social programs – then we can have a world that is a better world for all.”

And Al Gore, Mr. Climate Change himself, spoke during the summit. “This is a time for a reset to fix a bunch of challenges,” he said. “First among them, the climate crisis.”

Folks, viruses don’t care about socialism or capitalism. Viruses don’t care if we have zero global carbon emissions. To hide behind these agendas and blame a global pandemic on capitalism and global greenhouse gas emissions is xxxxx.

A Complete Overhaul?

In a recent article on Fox Business, Justin Haskins, who’s no fan of the agenda, offers his two cents. He says, “The purpose of the Great Reset isn’t merely to enact policies that would lead to additional wealth redistribution, but rather to completely overhaul the world’s existing structures and institutions.”

Haskins then points to comments by Schwab. He says, “the world must act jointly and swiftly to revamp all aspects of our societies and economies, from education to social contracts and working conditions.”

Haskins continues, “How, exactly, are these leaders planning on convincing Americans and citizens of every other industrialized nation to abandon modern capitalism? By scaring people into believing that these changes are essential for stopping the next great ‘crisis’ the world will face when the COVID-19 pandemic finally subsides: climate change.”

“At the World Economic Forum’s June meeting, one speaker after another cited climate change and environmental sustainability as the key justifications for radical economic changes that would include massive new regulations and restrictions on economic activity, wealth taxes and expansive government programs comparable to the Green New Deal.”

Ultimately, according to Haskins, the goal is for the global elites to control more of our lives. This also comes under the guise of helping the world.

“The elites at the World Economic Forum can effectively control economic activity on a scale” that no one has achieved before, he says. “These are truly dangerous times for those who support individual liberty and free markets.”

Up Next:

Continue Reading

Business

Proposal: Cut Taxes On Two Lowest Income Brackets By 50%

Avatar

Published

on

Proposal: Cut Taxes On Two Lowest Income Brackets By 50%

Democrats hope to pass the $3 trillion HEROES Act. On the other hand, Republicans discuss another round of stimulus checks or “back to work” bonuses. These bonuses aim to help Americans struggling to financially recover from the coronavirus pandemic. While all this is happening, a new idea has been proposed: cut taxes in the lowest two income brackets by 50% or more. This will really help those who need it the most.

The idea is from John C. Yoo, a professor at the UC Berkeley School of Law, and he says it would “turbocharge” the economy.

“Little doubt exists that the U.S. economy needs the help,” Yoo says. Additionally, his proposal, although unconventional, would immediately help those in need.

“The president could establish an economic recovery deferred action program that cut taxes immediately for those in the lowest brackets by 50 percent or more. This could accelerate the economic recovery far faster than current proposals for more unemployment payments or business aid, which help alleviate suffering but do little for growth. Trump could establish an economic recovery deferred action program that cut taxes immediately for those in the lowest brackets by 50 percent or more,” says Yoo.

“Turbocharging” the Economy

The tax savings, according to Yoo, would far exceed any potential stimulus check the government would issue. It would also provide immediate help.

“Imagine the boost to the economy if Trump cut taxes on the lowest two brackets to zero. A married couple making up to $20,000 would save $2,000 in federal taxes, while a married couple making $80,000 could save an additional $7,000 or so.”

“These families would not have to wait upon government checks in the mail; they could see the funds immediately in their paychecks.” Yoo said.

Yoo points out that the benefits would be more than just a tax break, it could also revitalize small businesses.

“Tax cuts would mean larger paychecks, which would create an incentive to return to work rather than remaining unemployed and on public assistance. Middle-class families would have a greater incentive to run the risks of starting or operating small businesses if they could keep more of the profits, instead of handing them over to the federal government.”

A Plus for The Administration

Yoo says cutting taxes on the lowest income brackets will help President Trump show support for the poor and minorities.

“A broad tax cut could answer accusations that the administration does not care about the poor or minorities. Trump could focus his deferred tax collection program to benefit the poorest the most, says Yoo, before adding, “He could also target certain geographic areas, such as the inner cities, for full tax breaks regardless of bracket. State COVID lockdowns have impacted the poor the most by shutting down restaurants, travel and hospitality, retail stores, and other businesses dependent on face-to-face interaction.”

While Yoo’s proposal is unconventional, it’s also practical. It avoids adding to our already ballooning national debt. It also satisfies the need to provide immediate relief to families. Also, it shows a good-faith effort to bridge the wealth gap by truly giving a tax break to those that need it most.

Up Next:

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Facebook

4th of July Sale

Trending

Copyright © 2019 The Capitalist. his copyrighted material may not be republished without express permission. The information presented here is for general educational purposes only. MATERIAL CONNECTION DISCLOSURE: You should assume that this website has an affiliate relationship and/or another material connection to the persons or businesses mentioned in or linked to from this page and may receive commissions from purchases you make on subsequent web sites. You should not rely solely on information contained in this email to evaluate the product or service being endorsed. Always exercise due diligence before purchasing any product or service. This website contains advertisements.