Connect with us


Treasury Will Let Emergency Lending Programs Expire



The symbol of the United States Department of the Treasury portrayed with the US flag-Emergency Lending Programs Expire-ss-featured

Steven Mnuchin made it known that the Treasury will let emergency lending programs expire on December 31. In addition, he asked the Federal Reserve to return any unused money. These include those that support the markets for corporate bonds and municipal debts. They also include the program that extends loans to small and mid-sized businesses.

RELATED: Democrats Unwilling To Compromise On Stimulus, Says Treasury Secretary

In a letter to Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell, Mnuchin said the programs “have clearly achieved their objectives.” As such, they will not need an extension going into 2021. “I am requesting that the Federal Reserve return the unused funds to the Treasury,” he wrote. Mnuchin said that he was “personally involved in drafting the relevant part of the legislation.” Thus, he believed Congress intended the programs to stop by the end of the year.

Which Programs are Expiring?

Mnuchin’s letter to Powell informed their willingness to let five programs expire on schedule. Also, the Treasury requested 90-day extensions for four emergency lending programs. Congress can reappropriate the returned $455 billion fund for spending elsewhere.

Specifically, the programs Mnuchin prefers to expire by year-end include the primary and secondary market corporate credit facilities. In addition, they are okay with ending the Municipal Liquidity Facility, the Main Street Lending Program, and the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility. Meanwhile, the Treasury sought extensions for four programs. These are the Commercial Paper Funding Facility, the Primary Dealer Credit Facility, the Money Market Mutual Fund Liquidity Facility, and the Paycheck Protection Program Liquidity Facility.

Fed Disappointed

The Federal Reserve expressed disappointment in the decision to close the various programs. In a statement, they said, “The Federal Reserve would prefer that the full suite of emergency facilities established during the coronavirus pandemic continue to serve their important role as a backstop for our still-strained and vulnerable economy.”

Powell preferred the lending programs to stay for the time being. In remarks made Tuesday, he said the programs need more time.

He said: “When the right time comes, and I don’t think that time is yet or very soon, we will put those tools away.”

The Market Reacts

The Treasury’s decision move poses a risk. Markets may lose the trademark confidence knowing the Fed is right behind them. The absence of Fed programs removes the backstop that’s needed when things go south. From here on, the market assumes all the risk. This is especially important given the resurgence of the coronavirus. A lingering pandemic can cripple the economy even longer. Kathy Jones, the chief fixed-income strategist at Charles Schwab, likened it to playtime. She tweeted: “Mnuchin decides to quit and take his toys with him. Wow.”

Krishna Guha of Evercore thinks removing backstops might be tricky. “The question is when is the right time to do it in a way that doesn’t run any risk whatsoever of a resumption of market stress. You could get lucky, and this ultimately passes without causing severe damage. But if you are unlucky, this could end up being extremely costly,” said Mr. Guha.

‘No Longer Needed’

Republican congresspeople agreed with Mnuchin’s assessment. They said that some programs are no longer necessary. The billions of dollars in their budget can serve better purposes elsewhere. Representative Pat Toomey (R-Pa) supported Mnuchin’s letter. He welcomed the expiration of the programs to restore liquidity. He also said the deadline is “as Congress intended and the law requires.”

On the other hand, Democrats sided with the Fed. They argued that the country still needs these safety nets. After all, the US is still dealing with a resurging virus as infections and the body count continue to rise. Bharat Ramamurti, a member of the COVID-19 Congressional Oversight Commission, even suggested that the Fed was under no obligation to return the funds. “Under its contracts with the Treasury, the Fed can and should reject the request,” he said. He said the wording of the CARES Act doesn’t require a return. Ramamurti believes the Fed can continue using the equity already committed by Treasury.

Deadline Set

Treasury officials remain optimistic that the economy is ready to rebound. The increasing likelihood of a vaccine this year points to a faster recovery. But until a vaccine is actually delivered, Powell thinks there’s a risk. The economy has “a long way to go,” and things might get worse before they get better.

The move leaves the incoming administration with fewer programs at their disposal. They will have fewer backstops to use when the economy starts to sputter again. As economist Jason Furman said:  “What is the downside to continuing them as insurance against worse developments?”

Watch this as CNBC’s Squawk Box tells you why the Fed's emergency lending programs may still be necessary:

Do you agree with the Treasury department that some emergency lending programs should end by December 31?

Please Select One:

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Do you agree with the Treasury department that extensions are unnecessary? Or do you believe that given the present condition, an extension is necessary? Let us know what you think by sharing your opinions below.



  • Sonia E Noriega says:

    It’s too early to really predict. Right now too many r out of work.

  • Anonymous says:

    If pelosi would quit playing game and figure out we don’t want to bail out the democrats broke states ,then the bill would pass.

  • Anonymous says:

    Anonymous: I bet you believe Q is a real person. Biden lost the election to voter fraud and 666 children should be held in cages and separated from their parents as an immigration policy.

  • Bill says:

    It needed to be able to help the people like myself that are trying just to keep there heads above the water just to keep going and both of the parties need to get another stimulus packages for the USA citizen and small business and people who are needing help NOW it should have been done already for everyone

  • DeeRoe says:

    If we should have a Biden administration, heaven forbid, let them start with a clean slate

  • Anonymous says:

    We the American people need financial help. Im personally trying to make it on $205 a week from unemployment my rent is $1200, our state is shut back down, and our job market sucks. On top of trying to do virtual learning with my 7 year old. The Holidays are looking horrible and we as Americans are loosing our homes, credit scores, savings, cars, and ALL HOPE. Once any financial funding does come we are so far behind in every thing its just all going to go to bills. 😢

  • Ann H Bennett says:

    I believe our citizens of the US really need another stimulus check.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2023 The Capitalist. his copyrighted material may not be republished without express permission. The information presented here is for general educational purposes only. MATERIAL CONNECTION DISCLOSURE: You should assume that this website has an affiliate relationship and/or another material connection to the persons or businesses mentioned in or linked to from this page and may receive commissions from purchases you make on subsequent web sites. You should not rely solely on information contained in this email to evaluate the product or service being endorsed. Always exercise due diligence before purchasing any product or service. This website contains advertisements.


Is THE newsletter for…


Stay up-to-date with the latest kick-ass interviews, podcasts, and more as we cover a wide range of topics, in the world of finance and technology. Don't miss out on our exclusive content featuring expert opinions and market insights delivered to your inbox 100% FREE!