Connect with us

Trending News

Crude rallies from Monday’s rout, one day after hitting six-month lows

Editorial Staff

Published

on

Investing.com — Crude futures rebounded slightly from Monday’s massive rout that sent prices crashing to six-month lows, as investors await the release of the American Petroleum Institute’s weekly inventory report for further signals on the widening supply and demand gulf in global energy markets.

On the New York Mercantile Exchange, WTI crude for September delivery traded in a tight range between $45.28 and $46.22 a barrel, before settling at $45.75, up 1.27% on the day. One session earlier, Texas Long Sweet futures plunged 4% to close near $45 a barrel – falling to its lowest level since mid-March. It was preceded by a sharp downturn in July when futures crashed by more than 21%, experiencing its worst month in more than six years.

On the Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), North Sea brent crude also rallied from Monday’s poor session. for September delivery wavered between $49.54 and $50.45 a barrel before closing at $50.00 a barrel, up 0.48 or 0.97%. The spread between the international and U.S. benchmarks stood at $4.25, slightly below Monday’s level of $4.30 at the close.

Energy traders on the whole are anticipating a draw in U.S. weekly stockpiles when the API releases its weekly inventory report on Tuesday. Separately, a U.S. government report on Wednesday could show that U.S. crude stockpiles fell by 1.3 million for the week that ended on July 31. Last week, U.S. crude futures surged by more than 1.5% after the Energy Information Administration (EIA) said crude stockpiles nationwide fell by 4.203 million barrels, below expectations for a 1.88 million draw. U.S. crude inventories remain near 460 million barrels, around its highest level in at least 80 years.

Any supply draws are viewed as bullish for crude, amid a glut of oversupply in energy markets worldwide.

For the month of July, OPEC supply surged to 32.01 million barrels per day, according to a Reuters survey, rising slightly from an upwardly revised total of 31.87 million bpd in June. Since roiling global energy markets in November with a strategic decision to boost its market share by leaving its production ceiling above 30 million bpd, OPEC supply has increased by more than 1.6 million bpd.

The decision by the world’s largest oil cartel triggered a protracted battle with the U.S. for global market share, causing futures’ prices to plunge by roughly 50% from its level near Thanksgiving. The EIA said last week that U.S. output remains around 9.5 million barrels per day – a level that continues to hover around 40-year highs. A dip in prices, however, could force U.S. shale producers to cut output due to its high drilling costs.

Elsewhere, the White House received a ringing endorsement on Tuesday when U.S. Senator Tim Kaine (D, Virginia) said he would support the nuclear agreement with Iran. Congress has until September 17 to review the comprehensive deal struck between Iran and a group of six Western powers last month, after a series of delays. The Persian Gulf state is reportedly hoarding up to 30 million barrels of crude in reserve ready for export in the months after a deal is finalized.

The , which measures the strength of the greenback versus a basket of six other major currencies, fell to an intraday low of 97.31, before rallying to 97.97, up 0.40% on the session.

Dollar-denominated commodities such as gold become more expensive for foreign purchasers when the dollar appreciates.

Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data .

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Biden’s ‘Made In America’ Initiative Crippled By His Own Economic Plan

Avatar

Published

on

Biden’s ‘Made In America’ Initiative Crippled By His Own Economic Plan

Democratic nominee Joe Biden released his “Made in America” plan last week. However, at least one critic says none other than Joe Biden himself will fail the plan.

Brian Brenberg, a professor of business and economics at The King’s College in Manhattan, says Biden’s “Made in America” plan is a list of “vague promises” that directly conflict with his own economic plan.

“It amounts to a laundry list of vague promises to create jobs, increase federal spending by hundreds of billions of dollars, and raise taxes on U.S. companies with overseas operations. But the biggest threat to Biden’s “Made in America” goals is his own economic plan,” says Brenberg.

He says if Biden really did want to strengthen businesses and bring back workers, he would make America the greatest country in the world to start a business. But his actions say differently.

“If he were really serious about strengthening businesses and workers here at home, his first step would be to make America the best place on earth to build businesses. That means cutting — not increasing — taxes and regulations he’s already put on the table.”

Flaw’s in Biden’s “Made in America” Plan

Biden’s errors are limited to just his “Made in America” plan, says Brenberg. They also spill over into his “Green New Deal,” however. It was jammed full of “massive new growth-killing taxes, spending, and regulations,” they said. This was all done by the Bernie Sanders-socialism side of the aisle.

The Made in America plan calls for higher taxes on corporations, income, investments, inheritance and social security. Brenberg says the majority of these tax increases are supposed to impact only wealthy individuals. Those are the people who make more than $400,000 per year in income.

The problem though, is that Biden’s new taxes won’t raise enough from the wealthy to cover all the new spending he’s proposing. According to Brenberg, Biden’s tax hikes will raise between $3-4 trillion. This is far too little to cover his $11 trillion in new spending.

“Middle class Americans shouldn’t be surprised when they get pressed into paying for the shortfall,” says Brenberg.

Doing the Opposite of the Intention

He adds that taken as a whole, Biden’s plan disincentives anyone from starting new businesses in the US.

“When you add it all up, making things in Joe Biden’s America is going to be more costly, more complicated, and far less attractive to many companies and would-be entrepreneurs.”

Biden’s camp knows this, which is why Brenberg says the plan specifically penalizes companies for trying to leave the US and move their headquarters or operations to countries with lower taxes.

Tax-inversions, many know them as, spiked during the Obama years when companies fled high taxes here for more favorable locations. That all stopped, says Brenberg, with the Trump tax cuts in 2017. But a Biden victory in November will cause many companies to once again look to move out of the country. Penalizing them is the wrong approach.

“Threatening even more new taxes and rules to keep that from happening is not the answer.”

Encouraging “Made in America”

There is only one way to encourage “Made in America,” according to Brenberg. That is to make it the best place on earth to start and run a business. However, Biden’s plan will do the opposite.

“’Made in America’ works when America is the best place on the planet to start, grow, and invest in a business. That means keeping taxes low, ensuring regulations aren’t burdensome and avoiding utopian schemes to reinvent the economy based on radical ideology.”

“Right now, Joe Biden’s economic plans are failing on all three of those counts,” he says. Brenberg also adds that “no amount of government giveaways, government threats, or ‘Made in America’ branding will make up for it.”

Up Next:

Continue Reading

Business

Ron Paul: This Is The Biggest Financial Bubble In History

Avatar

Published

on

Ron Paul: This Is The Biggest Financial Bubble In History

Dr. Ron Paul believes that we are in the biggest financial bubble in history. He also said that when it pops, it will be very violent.

In a recent interview with Kitco News, Paul covered a wide range of topics. Some of these topics include the Federal Reserve, interest rates, and the economy.

He was asked about the Federal Reserve’s dual mandate of full employment and inflation control. To this, Paul said the Fed shouldn’t even be in the business of worrying about either.

“They shouldn’t even be in the business of pretending that if they want a good, healthy economy, and they want as best the employment possible, and the most balanced pricing system, you have to get rid of the system. You can’t have this artificial system from the Federal Reserve,” he said.

Free Market Should Set Interest Rates

Paul said the free market should be the one setting interest rates. Additionally, when the Fed thinks it has control over things is when problems start.

“You have to have a market rate of interest, and you have to have a money supply that’s determined by the market rather than by the politicians, because we are seeing the results of many, many years of this, especially since 1971 with what is happening now, it’s the runaway spending, we can’t have the runaway spending, if we continue to do this, and the fact that they pretend that they can control things, every time they think they have control then there’s a major correction, which we are in the midst of.”

He said the big event was when the Fed realized last fall that the bubble was starting to pop. He also mentioned that it began doing everything it could to keep it going. This meant cutting rates to zero.

“The big event that turned this whole thing on was in the fall when it was realized that the financial bubble was collapsing and they have destroyed for many, many years the most important function of the market, in the money supply are the interest rates. So we destroyed the pricing structure and that’s why we have so many mistakes, malinvestment, too much debt, too much government, and it wouldn’t happen if you didn’t have a Federal Reserve system that thinks they can manage the economy through monetary manipulation.”

Gold and the Market

Paul said the Fed can print as much money as it wants, but ultimately gold is what underpins the markets.

“I remember when gold was legalized in the 70’s, everybody thought the gold price would soar up, but it had already gone up, but at the time, our Treasury Department and the IMF (International Monetary Fund) dumped a lot of gold just to try and punish the people who knew that gold was a haven. So there’s a lot of monetary and gold manipulations, but ultimately the markets are determined by metals, not by paper money.”

He said we are getting close to a “cataclysmic” end to the bubble. The unfortunate result is that a lot of people will be wiped out financially.

“We are coming desperately close to a cataclysmic end to the current monetary system. I happen to believe it’s the biggest financial bubble in the history of monetary policy for the whole world. And the correction is going to be very violent, and it’s already pretty bad. People are going to get a lot poorer.”

“The bills have to be paid, the economy is going to turn down, and a lot of people have already gotten a lot poorer, but it’s going to get a lot worse unless we wake up and return to some sound economic and monetary policies.”

Up Next:

Continue Reading

Business

Despite Setting All-Time High, S&P 500 Vulnerable Due To Uneven Recovery

Avatar

Published

on

Despite Setting All-Time High, S&P 500 Vulnerable Due To Uneven Recovery

Despite the S&P 500 closing at a record high last week, the recovery hasn’t been a rising tide that lifts all boats.

Analysis by CNBC shows that the vast majority of stocks have yet to regain their prior highs. In fact, since the previous high on February 19 and the new high on August 18, only 38% of stocks in the S&P 500 are in positive territory over that time frame. An alarming 62% of stocks are still in negative territory since February 19.

Michael Yoshikami, CEO of Destination Wealth Management, appeared on CNBC last week. The described a “shift in demand” during his appearance. He says it’s the reason why some stocks have fully recovered while others are still reeling.

“It’s not as if everything is rising,” he said. “You pull money out of names that really aren’t attractive given current conditions. And that money moves over to companies that are thriving in this environment.”

Recoveries in Different Industries

The recovery has also varied significantly depending on the industry. In consumer staples, health care, and information technology industries, more than half of the stocks have climbed into positive territory. This happened between Feb. 19 and Aug. 18. Contrast that with stocks in the energy and utility sector where less than 10% of stocks are in positive territory since February 19.

Among the stocks hit hardest since the February peak are Norwegian Cruise Lines (-71%), Occidental Petroleum (-67%), and Carnival Corporation (-67%).

Amazingly, despite the eye-popping rally since the March low, there are six stocks that are still in negative territory from March 23 through August 18: Coty Inc., FirstEnergy, Walgreens, Gilead Sciences, Wells Fargo, and Intel.

Just five stocks, Amazon, Alphabet (Google’s parent company), Apple, Microsoft and Facebook account for 20% of the index by weighting, the biggest weighting for the top five stocks in the index since 1980.

Those 5 stocks alone have accounted for 25% of the overall index return since the March lows.

“Divergence Between Winners and Losers”

Brad Neuman, director of market strategy for Alger, a New York fund manager, says this shows a “record divergence between winners and losers.”

“The mega-cap growth and tech companies have done incredibly well in the pandemic,” said Meghan Shue, head of investment strategy for Wilmington Trust. “We think it is probably a bit too far too fast — there is a great deal of optimism priced into the market right now.”

The uneven recovery puts the market in danger. This is according to a man The Wall Street Journal calls “the hedge-fund king you’ve never heard of.”

Jeffrey Talpins, the founder of Element Capital, warned clients in a letter last week about repositioning his hedge fund. He plans on repositioning his $16 billion hedge fund for a potential downturn after an unprecedented rally.

“We believe that the rally has now extended well beyond levels justified by the state of the economy, and with little regard for the myriad of risk factors looming on the horizon.”

Up Next:

Continue Reading

Subscribe To Our Newsletter:

Advertisement

Facebook

Trending

Copyright © 2019 The Capitalist. his copyrighted material may not be republished without express permission. The information presented here is for general educational purposes only. MATERIAL CONNECTION DISCLOSURE: You should assume that this website has an affiliate relationship and/or another material connection to the persons or businesses mentioned in or linked to from this page and may receive commissions from purchases you make on subsequent web sites. You should not rely solely on information contained in this email to evaluate the product or service being endorsed. Always exercise due diligence before purchasing any product or service. This website contains advertisements.

[email]
[email]