Connect with us

Business

Moore: Republican’s Newest Stimulus Bill Has Fundamental Flaw

Avatar

Published

on

Moore: Republican’s Newest Stimulus Bill Has Fundamental Flaw

Stephen Moore says the Senate Republicans got most of the newest stimulus bill right but believes that it contains a “fundamental flaw” and President Trump shouldn’t sign it.

Moore, a member of President Trump’s economic recovery task force and an economist at FreedomWorks, says the plan put forward by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell “isn’t half bad” and will help get the country back on track. He also says that we can “take solace in the fact that the price tag is “only” $1 trillion” compared to the HEROES ACT passed by Democrats and Speaker Nancy Pelosi that totalled a whopping $3 trillion.

Moore provided his thoughts on whether or not he sees a benefit from what he calls the “major planks” of the plan.

  1. Another Round of $1,200 Stimulus Checks

    Moore gives a “thumbs down” to this aspect of the bill. He believes it is counterproductive and rewards inactivity. He says “Dropping free money into people’s pockets is no road to prosperity. This isn’t a stimulus, it is a redistribution of money from producers to non-producers.”

  2. Additional Funds For The Paycheck Protection Program

    Moore says “let’s wait and see” how this plays out. It’s important that the government be repaid for these loans, and they don’t become forgivable grants, says Moore.

  3. Unemployment benefits are reduced to $200 per week until states create their own plans that pay up to 70% of previous wages.

    Letting the $600 per week unemployment benefits expire was “essential” says Moore, who gives this initiative a “thumbs up.” He says the CBO (Congressional Budget Office) found that five out of six workers were making more money staying unemployed than going back to work. He also points to a study by Casey Mulligan at the University of Chicago that found the additional unemployment benefits would reduce employment by almost 10 million jobs by the end of the year. Moore says “There is NO jobs recovery if this policy continues. No backing down.”

  4. Liability Protection for Schools, Businesses, Churches, etc. As They Reopen

    “Thumbs Up” says Moore. He says businesses that reopen need to be protected from frivolous lawsuits should someone get sick. Without liability protection, the Committee to Unleash Prosperity found that at least 500,000 jobs would be lost.

  5. $100 Billion To Help Schools and Universities Reopen

    Moore gives this a solid “thumbs down.” He says at the moment, most public schools have announced that they won’t be reopening in the fall, so what do they need the money for? “Any federal funding for schools this year and next should only be for schools that are open FULLTIME.”

  6. Education Freedom Grants To Cover Scholarships For Private Schools and Payments To Parents For Homeschooling

    “I feel like I’ve died and gone to heaven,” says Moore. He gives this a resounding “thumbs up.” He adds, “This will give potentially millions of parents, mostly with low incomes, a chance to send their kids to good schools this fall. Distance learning is a failure for at least half of the bottom half of children; they need in-class instruction.”

  7. 100% Deductibility For Business Meals and Entertainment

    This gets a solid “thumbs down” from Moore. “What would a stimulus bill be without a few special interest giveaways to the corporate lobbyists?” he asks.

While Moore’s opinion of the bill is that they got it half right, he does point out what he believes is a fundamental flaw: a lack of a payroll tax cut through the rest of the year. He says it would help “150 million workers and nearly 30 million small businesses and self-employed business owners.”

Moore adds, “This would create up to 3 million jobs over the next six months and give a pay raise of 7.5 percent for every nurse, teacher, home care worker, construction worker, and police officer in America – the heroes of our economy.”

He worries that the bill that McConnell presented yesterday won’t survive negotiations with Democrats.

“All in all, a good bill. The problem is it will get much worse as Trump and McConnell begin to negotiate with Pelosi. There is not one single feature of the Pelosi bill that is positive for the economy,” says Moore.

His final thought is for the person who will eventually sign the bill into law.

“President Trump should not sign any final product without the payroll tax cut,” says Moore.

Up Next:

Business

It’s Not ‘Unreasonable’ To See Gold Prices Soar To $4000 During Bull Market

Avatar

Published

on

It’s Not ‘Unreasonable’ To See Gold Soar To $4000 During Bull Market

Despite gaining 35% this year, gold prices have plenty of room to run, says Michael Cuggino, the CEO of the Permanent Portfolio Family of Funds.

Cuggino says that since gold formed a triple bottom from the end of 2015 through November of 2018, it has consistently climbed higher and has really soared this year.

“Ever since then, it has been a gradual move up, then some down. It moves sometimes in big chunks, gives some back, sits around and does nothing, reacts to stimulus, inflation, the value of dollar and euro … but it has had an aggressive move this year,” Cuggino said.

Possible Setbacks Along the Way?

With gold climbing so quickly in a relatively short period of time, Cuggino warns there could be sharp pullbacks along the way. But he says the overall trend is for higher gold prices.

Cuggino says the recipe of continued money printing by the government, the dollar steadily declining and growing inflationary fears mean it would “not be an unreasonable move” to see gold prices soaring to $4,000 an ounce.

He points to a metric that compares gold prices to the closing levels for the S&P 500 index. Gold is currently trading at 0.6 times the level of the S&P 500 and it hasn’t climbed above 0.7 since 2014. But when you go back to August 2011, gold traded as high as 1.7 times the S&P 500, so there’s plenty of upside for gold prices.

Gold Still Has a Long Way to Go

Just adjusting for inflation, gold would need to climb above $2,800 per ounce to equal 1980 levels, which means this gold rally has a long way to go.

Mike Shedlock, the Mish Talk blogger and investment adviser at SitkaPacific Capital Management, thinks the fuel that could push gold to $2,800 per ounce could come from all the hedge funds that are currently on the sidelines and missed the early innings of the gold rally.

“There is ample room for Fear of Missing Out to kick in as the managed money and big spec hedge funds sat out much of the recent rally,” he writes. “And with 105,025 short contracts there is plenty of fuel for a short squeeze too.”

E.B. Tucker, director of Metalla Royalty and Streaming, believes that the current rally will continue, and he thinks gold prices could hit $2,500 by the end of the year.

“Normally I would say [the bull run is overheated] but what I’m seeing in the daily action is that gold is rising in a very measured way and is not meeting much resistance, so when that’s happening you just step out of the way and let it go, that’s what you do,” Tucker said.

Like Cuggino, Tucker says there could be pullbacks in price along the way, but he says we’re in a secular bull market like we may never see again.

“This is a secular bull market. This is a bull market in gold that you’re probably never going to see in the course of your life again.”

Up Next:

Continue Reading

Business

Nasdaq Sets A New Record, Dow Forms A ‘Golden Cross’

Avatar

Published

on

Nasdaq Sets A New Record, Dow Forms A ‘Golden Cross’

Since bottoming in late March, the stock market continues to set records in what seems like an almost invincible climb higher.

Nevermind that Jim Cramer said the rally is being driven by the “power of enthusiastic buyers who do not know what they’re doing” and that he can’t fathom “how stupidly bullish this market can be,” the fact is that stocks are climbing higher.

The latest evidence for a runaway stock market is that the Nasdaq Composite Index just gained 1,000 points. It happened in the shortest amount of time in the last 20 years.

1000-Point Climb

It took 114 days for the index to climb from the 9,000 level to the 10,000 level. That milestone was hit on June 10 of this year.

In just 40 days since, the Nasdaq has tacked on another 1,000 points, climbing above the 11,000 level.

That is the fastest 1000-point gain for the index since it took a blistering 38 days in 1999. Back then, it climbed from the 3,000 level to the 4,000 level.

You might recall that period, it was during the dot-com bubble. We know how that ended.

Today’s 1000-point climb is only a 10% overall gain (from 10,000 to 11,000) compared to the 33% overall gain during the ‘99 surge (from 3,000 to 4,000). However, it’s still a blistering pace that investors pay attention to.

“Although 11,000 by itself doesn’t mean much, these big round numbers are a nice reminder of just how strong this rally has been since the March lows,” said Ryan Detrick, the chief investment strategist at LPL Financial.

A ‘Golden Cross’

Not wanting to miss the fun, the Dow Jones Industrial Average just flashed its own bullish signal to investors.

The index just formed a “golden cross,” where the shorter-term 50-day moving average crosses above the long-term 200-day moving average.

Investors consider this to be a bullish signal for the index, as it shows the short term momentum is strong.

Conversely, when the 50-day moving average crosses below the 200-day it’s called a “death cross” and is a bearish indicator. The last “death cross” was on March 20. On that day, the stock market was pummeled by the economic shutdown caused by the coronavirus pandemic.

With the rally being led by technology stocks, the Nasdaq – which is more than 50% tech stocks – has gained more than 60% since the March lows. The S&P 500 is made up of about 25% tech stocks and has gained nearly 50% since March, and only 20% of the Dow is tech stocks so it’s lagged behind, gaining only 47% since March.

How reliable is the “golden cross” for stocks to move higher? According to Dow Jones Market Data, the last time a “golden cross” failed was in January 2016. That was also the last time the market slipped lower.

Up Next:

Continue Reading

Business

Get In On The Hottest Investment Trend Today: SPACs

Avatar

Published

on

Get In On The Hottest Investment Trend Today: SPACs

The hottest new investment trend right now are SPACs, or special purpose acquisition company. It’s how Nikola Motor Company, which plans on making both electric and hydrogen-powered trucks, went public virtually overnight.

With the IPO market cooling, it has become an appealing alternative for private companies looking for a quicker and easier path to being publicly traded.

Now billionaires are tripping over themselves to create SPACs as quickly as possible. They need to do so if they want to get in on the gold rush.

What are SPACs?

SPACs are commonly referred to as a “blank check” company and with good reason: they are created to go around gathering a bunch of money from investors with the only goal to buy an existing business within a specific time frame, usually 18 to 24 months.

The management team essentially has a blank check to go out and buy any business it sees fit. Some are created with a specific acquisition in mind. Others are created simply to have the money in place and ready to go when the opportunity arises.

The structure is very similar to private equity deals or leveraged buyouts. Also, private equity firms, hedge funds, and other “smart money” investors sponsored the creation of many SPACs.

Many of these SPACs are publicly traded. So, if the idea of having “smart money” go around hunting for the best deals on your behalf sounds appealing, you can typically invest in them through your normal brokerage account.

Here’s a short list of SPACs that you can either buy today or can buy very shortly once they go public. Be aware, many of these SPACs are just a few weeks old. So, there isn’t much history to judge their performance by.

Pershing Square Tontine Holdings (PSTH.U)

Fresh off a billion-dollar payday in March, Pershing Square Capital Management’s Bill Ackman just launched a $4 billion SPAC, the largest in history after overwhelming interest from investors.

Ackman has the right to put in another billion, giving the company access to a total of $5 billion to hunt for what Ackman calls a “unicorn” with “significant long-term growth potential that will be likely candidates for inclusion in the S&P 500 index.”

“Our thesis is by having a $5 billion cash pile in a public company; it’s our own version of a unicorn. It’s a one-of-a-kind entity,” Ackman said during an interview with Yahoo Finance. “So, we’re looking to marry a unicorn. So we’re prettying ourselves up for the most attractive possible partner.”

Churchill Capital IV (CCIV.U)

While not publicly traded yet, this will be founder Michael Klein’s fourth SPAC. Two of them have acquired companies and one has yet to find an acquisition target. To highlight investor demand for SPACs, Klein raised $1.8 billion for his fourth SPAC. This figure stands at 80% more than what he originally planned.

With his latest SPAC, Klein is looking for a company with excellent long-term growth prospects, a strong competitive advantage, recurring revenue, attractive free cash flow. He is also looking for a company that is in an industry where consolidation opportunities exist.

Dragoneer Growth Opportunities (DGNR.U)

Like Churchill Capital, this SPAC is not yet publicly traded. The company is lead by CEO Marc Stad, who appeared multiple times on Fortune magazines “40 Under 40” list. Also, other directors include David Ossip, CEO of Ceridian HCM Holding, and Sarah Frier, CEO of neighborhood social network Nextdoor.

Stad has a strong pedigree, having backed a number of very successful companies in the past, including Spotify and Uber Technologies. Dragoneer will focus on six areas: software, internet, media, consumer/retail, healthcare IT, and financial services/fintech.

East Resources Acquisition (ERESU)

Current Buffalo Bills and Buffalo Sabres owner Terry Pegula started East Resources targeting the energy industry in North America.

It makes sense given Pegula’s history, having sold his company, East Resources, to Royal Dutch Shell for $4.7 billion in 2010.

Now Pegula is back, looking for operational control of a company that has long-lived assets with low fixed costs, that is producing oil and gas and generating free cash flow, but is operating below full capabilities.

With Pegula’s extensive knowledge of the oil and gas industry, he could find multiple opportunities in a short period of time.

Up Next:

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Facebook

Trending

Copyright © 2019 The Capitalist. his copyrighted material may not be republished without express permission. The information presented here is for general educational purposes only. MATERIAL CONNECTION DISCLOSURE: You should assume that this website has an affiliate relationship and/or another material connection to the persons or businesses mentioned in or linked to from this page and may receive commissions from purchases you make on subsequent web sites. You should not rely solely on information contained in this email to evaluate the product or service being endorsed. Always exercise due diligence before purchasing any product or service. This website contains advertisements.

[email]
[email]